![]() The interface then plays against you as navigating in a 3D space can cause headaches. While you can convert 2D images to 3D and vice versa, the complexity becomes noticeable when you create a new 3D model. Revision clouds can be used to show where objects or elements have been revised, making communication easier between team members, but more importantly, giving a clear framework for internal project documentation.ģD falls behind significantly with ease of use. Detailed elevation drawings become far easier to create and view, including drafting. With these tools, users can automatically create dimensions that move automatically when the object is moved. More experienced users, or experimenters, can allow macros to create shortcuts to help them speed up tool access.įor 2D, users can leverage AutoCAD to quickly draft detailed designs with greater accuracy as there is no need to use drawing instruments in a digital landscape. Instead, its functionality truly shines when used to create 2D designs and in-depth blueprints.ĭespite the complexity associated with CAD software as a whole, AutoCAD features an easy-to-use interface, enabling users to quickly find the tools they need through large icons and a clutter-free layout. It simply wasn't built to be used as a dedicated 3D model creation tool. While 3D model creation is a possibility, its limitations quickly become apparent and, in some cases, frustrating. Undoubtedly, AutoCAD works best when creating detailed and accurate 2D models. However, if you're looking for something that'll allow you to create complex 3D models, then you may be disappointed. If you're looking for CAD software that provides 2D & 3D creation opportunities, then look no further. If you're looking for CAD software that enables you to focus solely on engineering or construction, you'll gain significant use from AutoCAD. Users can use many specialized toolsets and complementary programs that focus on specific disciplines rather than doubling down on complete coverage. Where AutoCAD lacks in complexity, it makes up for it with versatility. However, more experienced users might find AutoCAD lacking in extensive use and be less viable as an option for larger, more complex projects. However, the engineers in the office next door to us would come over about once a month, asking us to open and resave a file they had gotten from an Architect who was using the AutoCAD Architectural Desktop.AutoCAD provides excellent functionality for users looking to experience CAD software and begin learning its implementation. It had 95% of the capability of AutoCAD (missing some of the very high end features most users do not use anyway.) I never found it missing any features I needed. It even had an AutoCAD compatibility mode, so you could enter AutoCAD commands and shortcuts. DWG file format, so it is compatible with files created in AutoCAD, and people using AutoCAD can use files created in IntelliCAD without needing to use conversion programs. It was a fraction of the cost of AutoCAD (Like $400). I used it in the last office where I worked. If I had my preference, we would be using AcceliCad Pro software by IntelliCAD. Don't ask me how it is set up, I am not the IT guy. ![]() Most of our workstations are XP, but we have 2 Win7 machines currently, including mine. ![]() I am currently using AutoCAD 2004 on a Windows 7 machine at work. We as consumers are going to be paying some high dollars out as banks, gov't agencies and other industries that are still using XP, upgrade. My only option at this time is to switch back to a Mac and use Parallels to run it on a VM that actually works. Presently using a 2006 Dell Optiplex 745 3.0GHZ dual core with 8GB ram, 1GB video, and a Western Digital 500Gb 10K rpm hard drive. I've tried some of the free CAD downloads, none work as well as AutoCAD to date.Īnybody have another way of running old versions of AutoCAD on 7 or 8.1? To upgrade to a new system means a newer computer and OPS, plus the purchase of a $4000 AutoCAD. Tried to get it working using the VM and XP mode downloads, but they didn't work on my machine. ![]() I've tried upgrading to Windows 7 and know it won't work with that OPS. With the end of XP looming next month and microscam forcing XP users to a new operating system (OPS), kind of curious what programs designers use. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |